Exactly!! The Taliban made terror and cruelty their act, but the international community only chants after every negative action of the Taliban, but they have not taken any practical action.
The international community has not taken any practical action
is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because there is evidence that Japan has taken practical action in the international community. The evidence states that Japan has assumed its responsibility in the international community and has been engaged in activities to strengthen resilience of communities.
Yes, I agree with you! But when the government enacts a law, that law must benefit the people; Not to the detriment of the people.
that law must benefit the people
is probably not correct.
The given text is a general statement that does not provide any specific information or evidence to support its claim. It does not specify how the law benefits the people or provide any examples or explanations. Therefore, it is difficult to determine the factuality of the statement based on the given text alone.
that law must not be to the detriment of the people
is probably not correct.
The given text is a subjective statement and does not make any factual claims. It does not provide any specific information or evidence to support its statement. Therefore, it cannot be determined as factual or non-factual.
So if the taliban let the grils to learn education and give the opportunity of work in the country so in here they dont need to claim.
The Taliban let the girls learn education
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the Taliban let girls learn education. However, the provided evidence clearly states that in December 2022, the Taliban banned female education by prohibiting females from attending universities. This evidence contradicts the claim made in the text.
The Taliban give the opportunity of work in the country
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the Taliban give the opportunity of work in the country. However, the provided evidence contradicts this statement by stating that the Taliban’s rule is exclusionary and provides few job opportunities, especially for minorities and those associated with the fallen Afghan Republic.
They don’t need to claim
is probably not correct.
The given text is a simple statement without any specific claims or factual information. It does not make any specific reference to any subject or context. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the factuality of the text based on the provided evidences.
Brain drain is a phenomenon of widespread migration of educated people, scientists and experts from one country or society to other countries and societies, which usually occurs due to lack of jobs and job security, military political conflicts and lack of security guarantees.
Brain drain usually occurs due to military political conflicts
is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because it states that brain drain usually occurs due to military political conflicts, which is not supported by the provided evidences. The evidences mention several common causes of brain drain, including political instability, but do not specifically mention military political conflicts as a usual cause.
Brain drain usually occurs due to lack of security guarantees
is probably not correct.
The given text states that brain drain usually occurs due to lack of security guarantees. However, the provided evidences suggest that brain drain is caused by several factors such as political instability, poor quality of life, limited access to health care, and a shortage of economic opportunity. These factors prompt skilled and talented workers to leave source countries for places that offer better opportunities. Therefore, the given text is not factual.
that law must benefit the people
is probably not correct.
The given text is a general statement that does not provide any specific information or evidence to support its claim. It does not specify how the law benefits the people or provide any examples or explanations. Therefore, it is difficult to determine the factuality of the statement based on the given text alone.
that law must not be to the detriment of the people
is probably not correct.
The given text is a subjective statement and does not make any factual claims. It does not provide any specific information or evidence to support its statement. Therefore, it cannot be determined as factual or non-factual.
They should Talk with international community about the solutions which they are facing and also reduce the poverty
They should reduce the poverty
is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because it does not provide any evidence or reasoning to support the claim that reducing poverty is beneficial or effective. The provided evidences suggest various solutions to poverty, but they do not directly support the statement that poverty should be reduced.
Yes for sure they have to support girls and help them to achieve their goals but they act upside down of that.
1 Like
Government should make peaceful space for people specially for youth, give people a positive spirit
1 Like
Government should give people a positive spirit
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it states that the government should give people a positive spirit, but there is no evidence provided to support this claim.
The educated people of Afghanistan should form a group to defend the educated people against the Taliban and pass a bill that will be assured by the Taliban that they (thinking minds) have security and peace in the society.
And make sure that it is supported by the United Nations and the group.
The educated people of Afghanistan should form a group to defend the educated people against the Taliban
is probably not correct.
The given text is a statement suggesting that educated people in Afghanistan should form a group to defend themselves against the Taliban. This statement does not provide any specific evidence or context to support its claim. Therefore, it is difficult to determine its factuality without additional information.
The educated people of Afghanistan should pass a bill that will be assured by the Taliban
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the educated people of Afghanistan should pass a bill that will be assured by the Taliban. However, there is no evidence provided that suggests the Taliban will be involved in assuring the bill. The provided evidences mention bills introduced by legislators in the U.S. that provide a path to permanent residency for Afghan evacuees. There is no mention of the Taliban’s involvement in passing these bills.
The bill should be supported by the United Nations
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because there is no evidence provided that supports the claim that the bill should be supported by the United Nations.
The brain drain after the Emirate government came to power has made the government offices of interest to experts and associates, and the colorful presence of the mafia in the field of politics and business in Afghanistan has mostly been surrounded by the black circle of the mafia and stained with the color of monopoly.
The brain drain after the Emirate government came to power has made the government offices of interest to experts and associates
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the brain drain occurred after the Emirate government came to power. However, there is no evidence provided to support this claim. The evidence provided only discusses brain drain in general and its effects on different countries. Therefore, we cannot determine the factuality of the given text based on the provided evidence.
Of course, they can communicate with foreign authorities and even the world community through international institutions. I think this will not be a difficult task for the Taliban; Provided that they intend to negotiate with the world for their recognition; Although we know that with the restrictions and difficult conditions imposed by the people above, especially the girls, it seems unlikely that they will even be recognized.
They intend to negotiate with the world for their recognition
is probably not correct.
The given text states that ‘They intend to negotiate with the world for their recognition’. The provided evidences mention negotiations at the World Trade Organization and U.S.-sponsored peace negotiations. These evidences suggest that negotiations are indeed taking place, but it is not explicitly mentioned that the negotiations are for recognition. Therefore, the given text is not supported by the provided evidences.
The Taliban will be recognized
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the Taliban will be recognized. However, the provided evidences indicate that no country has recognized the Taliban as Afghanistan’s new government since it took power in August 2021. Multiple sources confirm that only two nations, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, recognize the Taliban as the legitimate Afghan government. Therefore, the given text is non-factual.