We should make good future for us
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it is a subjective statement and does not provide any evidence or information to support the claim of making a good future.
So its need for a research, for now its a claim but acording to different coutries border and arrest of hundreds young men from different countries, it proof that men have more interested to leave their country.
1 Like
It is a claim that men have more interest to leave their country
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it makes a claim without providing any evidence or supporting information.
Different countries border and arrest hundreds of young men from different countries
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it states that different countries border and arrest hundreds of young men from different countries. However, the provided evidences state that crossing a state border is always a criminal offense and usually results in arrest and deportation. Additionally, the evidences mention specific instances where young men were detained for specific reasons, such as insulting a flag or joining terrorist groups. Therefore, the given text is not supported by the provided evidences.
Yes exactly, it caused many issues for people and force people to leave the country and they decided to be immigrants for years.
It caused many issues for people
is probably not correct.
The given text does not make any specific claims or provide any evidence to support its statement. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the factuality of the text based on the provided evidences.
They decided to be immigrants for years
is probably not correct.
The given text states that ‘They decided to be immigrants for years’. However, this statement is not clear and lacks context. It is not possible for individuals to ‘decide to be immigrants’ as immigration is a process of moving to a different country to live permanently. People may decide to immigrate, but the given text does not provide any specific information about who ‘they’ refers to or their reasons for immigrating. Without more context, it is difficult to determine the factuality of this statement.
I hope young generation can do something for thier countty insted of leaving it.
young generation can do something instead of leaving it
is probably not correct.
The given text is a general statement that does not provide any specific information or evidence to support its claim. Therefore, it cannot be determined whether the text is factual or not based on the given information.
But acording to social life that with out government the society will be like a forest, every people will do the activities that they want. So our developing and future related to government policy. We continue our life acording to government law that selected by the people of country.
1 Like
Without government, society will be like a forest
is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because it states that without government, society will be like a forest. However, the provided evidences clearly state that governments are responsible for making laws, providing services, protecting citizens, and ensuring social well-being. Therefore, society without government would not be like a forest.
Government law is selected by the people of the country
is probably not correct.
The given text states that government law is selected by the people of the country. However, the provided evidences indicate that legislation is enacted by Congress, not directly by the people. The Constitution grants Congress the sole authority to enact legislation and declare war. Additionally, regulations are issued by government departments and agencies to interpret and implement laws passed by Congress. Therefore, the text is non-factual.
If we wait for the current government to provide us a better life it’s impossible because since they get the control of Afghanistan they just forbids us from everything.
it’s impossible
is probably not correct.
The given text ‘it’s impossible’ is a subjective statement and cannot be factually proven or disproven. It does not make any specific claims or provide any evidence to support its statement.
they just forbids us from everything
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because there is evidence that contradicts it. The evidence states that no Catholic is forbidden to marry, while the given text claims that ‘they just forbids us from everything.’
I agree with you. after 20 yeaes, now momen lose everything and they have stay to thier house.
momen lose everything
is probably not correct.
The given text ‘momen lose everything’ does not make sense and does not match any of the provided evidences. The evidences talk about embracing change and uncertainty, but there is no mention of ‘momen lose everything’.
I hope that the current situation is temporary otherwise many percentage of Afghan people will become immigrants to other countries.
1 Like
Many percentage of Afghan people will become immigrants to other countries
is probably not correct.
The given text does not provide any specific percentage or evidence to support the claim that ‘Many percentage of Afghan people will become immigrants to other countries’. Without any specific information or evidence, it is not possible to determine the accuracy of this statement.
There are many ways to to decrease brain drain but unfortunately some of them are not adaptive here in Afghanistan due to our current regime, they don’t care what people think wether people leave the country or not they just want to implement their own thoughts by force for all that’s what people can’t accept it and it causes brain drain.
Some ways to decrease brain drain are not adaptive in Afghanistan
is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because it states that some ways to decrease brain drain are not adaptive in Afghanistan, without providing any evidence or explanation to support this claim.
The regime’s actions cause brain drain
is probably not correct.
The given text is a statement that claims the regime’s actions cause brain drain. To determine the factuality of this statement, we need to examine the provided evidences. However, the provided evidences do not directly address the specific actions of the regime or their impact on brain drain. Therefore, we cannot definitively determine the factuality of the given text based on the provided evidences.
Afghanistan humanitarian crisis worsened 2021, largely because of the country’s enduring economic collapse in the wake of the government.
Yes dear friend. No truth is hidden. The world community and United nation should support the people od Afghanistan with honesty!
Afghanistan humanitarian crisis worsened largely because of the government
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the Afghanistan humanitarian crisis worsened largely because of the government. However, the provided evidence states that the humanitarian crisis is the result of decades of conflict, chronic poverty, and recurrent natural disasters. There is no mention of the government being the main cause of the crisis in the evidence. Therefore, the given text is not supported by the evidence.