Day 1: Brain Drain Crisis in Post-2021 Afghanistan_TeamD

Afghanistan has been among the countries with the most emigrants in the world

is probably not correct.
The given text states that Afghanistan has been among the countries with the most emigrants in the world. However, the provided evidences do not mention Afghanistan as one of the top countries with the highest number of emigrants. The evidences list India, Mexico, Russia, China, Syria, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Ukraine as the top countries. Therefore, there is no evidence to support the claim made in the given text.

Afghanistan has ranked first in the world in international migration statistics

is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because the World Migration Report 2022 does not mention Afghanistan ranking first in international migration statistics. The report only provides data on the main origin countries for migrants residing in OECD, and Afghanistan is not mentioned in that list.

The current government should provide facilities specially for youth because they build the future of country, provide jobs for youth.

The current government should provide jobs for youth

is probably not correct.
The given text is a subjective statement and does not present any factual information. It is an opinion that the current government should provide jobs for youth.

Exactly. If any jobs provide for youth they will rescue from phenomena of brain drain!

jobs will rescue from phenomena of brain drain

is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it states that jobs will rescue from brain drain, which is not supported by the evidence. The evidence defines brain drain as the migration of health personnel in search of better living conditions, higher salaries, advanced technology, and stable political conditions. It does not mention anything about jobs rescuing from brain drain.

jobs will rescue from phenomena of brain drain

is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it states that jobs will rescue from brain drain, which is not supported by the evidence provided. The evidence defines brain drain as the migration of health personnel in search of better living conditions, higher salaries, advanced technology, and stable political conditions. It does not mention anything about jobs rescuing from brain drain.

Exactly, I agree with you

Changing the mentality of the Taliban is a useful step to get out of the current situation; Because when the Taliban have a closed mind, they cannot interact with enlightened and brain people.

Yeah. I afraid that day which our country will devoid of youth. It can be a big lose for us.

If the government provide the opportunity for youth, if they support the youth why the youth should migrate.

The Taliban cannot interact with enlightened and brain people

is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because there is evidence that contradicts it. The evidence states that the Taliban government has shown no inclination to interact with enlightened and brain people.

Our country will devoid of youth

is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because it states that ‘Our country will devoid of youth’, which implies that the country will be without any youth. However, the provided evidences clearly indicate that the youth are important for the development and progress of a nation. The evidences mention that the youth will make the country proud, that their dynamism and imagination can transform the social and economic fortunes of developed and developing countries, and that the development of any nation lies in the future generation. Therefore, it can be concluded that the country will not be devoid of youth.

The youth should not migrate

is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it states that the youth should not migrate, which contradicts the provided evidences that highlight the benefits and opportunities of youth migration. The evidences mention that youth migration can boost economic and social development, contribute to adaptation and resilience, and promote integration and social cohesion. Therefore, the given text is not supported by the provided evidences.

Yeah right! But do you think it is possible for Taliban to change their mentality? should we be optimistic?

Taliban can change their mentality

is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because there is no evidence provided to support the claim that the Taliban can change their mentality.

We should be optimistic

is probably not correct.
The given text is subjective and does not make any factual claims. It is an opinion statement rather than a statement of fact.

In the medium term, measure to increase local procurement should be supported by efforts to enhance the supply capacities of the Afghan economy, such as increasing infrastructure investment, building human capital in a demand-responsive manner, improving the business climate for the private sector.

1 Like

Okay that’s right , But how ? Can You give us more information?

Of course it’s over to them to accept the solution or not but our future is belong to our selves and we’re responsible not them.

1 Like

As I think we have to be optimistic , we will never be in one satuation . I hope that this satuation will change and we will have democracy and we can go to school and we can go to work and everywhere.

2 Likes

We have to be optimistic

is probably not correct.
The given text is subjective and does not make any factual claims. It is an expression of personal opinion rather than a statement that can be proven True or false.

We will never be in one situation

is probably not correct.
The given text is a general statement without any specific information or evidence to support it. Therefore, it cannot be determined whether it is factual or not based on the provided evidences.

This situation will change

is probably not correct.
The given text does not make any factual claims. It is a statement about a future event without providing any specific information or evidence. Therefore, it cannot be determined whether the text is factual or not based on the provided evidences.

We will have democracy

is probably not correct.
The given text does not provide any specific information or evidence to support the claim that ‘We will have democracy’. Without any supporting evidence, it is difficult to determine the factuality of this statement.

We can go everywhere

is probably not correct.
The given text states that ‘We can go everywhere’, which implies that it is possible to travel to every place in the world. However, the provided evidences suggest that there are certain areas that are unlivable or inaccessible to most human beings. Therefore, the given text is not factual.