Yes I agree with you Mr. Zaryab!
I think there were similar problems in previous governments; But now it is much more than before and it can be said that this situation will lead to a dangerous crisis.
I agree with Mr. Zaryab
is probably not correct.
The given text does not provide any specific information or context to determine its factuality. Without any additional information, it is not possible to determine whether the statement is factual or not.
There were similar problems in previous governments
is probably not correct.
The given text is a general statement that there were similar problems in previous governments. However, no specific problems or governments are mentioned, making it difficult to verify the factuality of the statement.
It is much more than before
is probably not correct.
The given text does not provide any specific information or context, making it difficult to determine its factuality. Without additional information or evidence, it is not possible to determine if the statement is factual or not.
The flight of knowledgeable and understanding people in all fields, especially in the field of governance, created a serious crisis because we know that the current government does not have the literacy to know how to conduct politics with other countries and take the country’s affairs in hand.
The flight of knowledgeable and understanding people in all fields created a serious crisis
is probably not correct.
The given text is a general statement that claims the flight of knowledgeable and understanding people in all fields created a serious crisis. However, there is no evidence provided to support this claim. The provided evidences only mention the importance of furthering knowledge and the occurrence of brain drain between countries and cities. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support the factual accuracy of the given text.
The flight of knowledgeable and understanding people in the field of governance created a serious crisis because the current government does not have the literacy to know how to conduct politics with other countries
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the current government does not have the literacy to know how to conduct politics with other countries. However, there is no evidence provided that supports this claim. The evidences provided only mention literacy rates and education challenges, but they do not specifically address the literacy of the current government. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the factuality of the given text based on the provided evidences.
The flight of knowledgeable and understanding people in the field of governance created a serious crisis because the current government does not have the literacy to take the country’s affairs in hand
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the current government does not have the literacy to take the country’s affairs in hand. However, the provided evidences mention the literacy rates in Uzbekistan, Pakistan, and Kerala, which indicate that there are literate individuals in these countries. Therefore, the given text is non-factual.
You’re absolutely right but I think the most big challenge for all people is insecurity, and it’s the reason that they decided to leave the country.
Brain drain is to emigrate the talents and it is alarge problem for a country that lose there talents and literate people.
1 Like
the most big challenge for all people is insecurity
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the most big challenge for all people is insecurity. However, the provided evidences mention various challenges such as loss, failure, setbacks, moral compass, mastering your mind, overcoming your story, misinformation, denial and inertia, energy, environment, food and water, poverty, fair trade, reduction of debt, employment and economic, age, what other people think, toxic people, fear, negativity, the past or the future, the state of the world, attracting the best people, developing your leadership and management team, and retaining your brilliant people. These evidences suggest that insecurity is just one of many challenges faced by people, and not necessarily the most significant one. Therefore, the given text is not factual.
Brain drain is to emigrate the talents from improving
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it incorrectly states that brain drain is to emigrate the talents from improving. However, the provided evidences clearly define brain drain as the emigration or migration of educated or professional individuals.
Exactly! This is what all the people emphasize, but I don’t know when the government will finally listen to the voice of the people?
2 Likes
And the soulation way to prevent from Brain Drain Crisis is the government should provided such as bellow needs for educated people; Providing the scientific needs of specialists and ensuring economic stability, increasing the level of job satisfaction, maintaining social dignity and dignity, strengthening finances, employing them in managerial affairs at the country’s macro level, and generally creating motivation and encouragement for the different educated peoples in their arias.
1 Like
In my opinion, the main reason for the brain drain crisis is insecurity and people’s worries about their lives and property, because people need a safe place to ensure their future, which unfortunately does not exist in Afghanistan.
1 Like
The main reason for the brain drain crisis is insecurity
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it states that the main reason for the brain drain crisis is insecurity, but the provided evidences suggest that economic opportunities, political strife and instability, and persecution based on religion, gender, or sexuality are also main reasons for brain drain.
The main reason for the brain drain crisis is people’s worries about their lives and property
is probably not correct.
The given text is stating that the main reason for the brain drain crisis is people’s worries about their lives and property. However, the provided evidences suggest that there are multiple reasons for brain drain, including economic opportunities, political strife, instability, and persecution based on religion, gender, or sexuality. Therefore, the given text is not factual as it oversimplifies the main reasons for brain drain.
A safe place does not exist in Afghanistan
is probably not correct.
The given text states that a safe place does not exist in Afghanistan. However, the provided evidence states that Mazar-i Sharif & Balkh are considered two of the safest areas of Afghanistan, although they still experience above-average violence and civil unrest. Therefore, the given text is not factual.
Government and International agencies can provide better employment opportunities for them.
To work on Talibans capacity building so they would understand the value and benefits of these people for the country.
Brain drain It means impoverishment of intellectuals, professionals, and technical resources of one country and enriching another
Brain drain means enriching another country
is probably not correct.
The given text states that brain drain means enriching another country. However, the provided evidences clearly define brain drain as the departure of educated or professional people from one country, economic sector, or field for another. The evidences consistently describe brain drain as a situation in which educated or skilled individuals leave their own country or area to live and work in another one. Therefore, the given text is not factual.
So when the talibans cames from 2021 in Afg the brain drain start and still continue the solution is this that taliban should make there specific rule and let the people to do there works and give them right and prevent from emigration of youths and brain drain.
In My opinion instead of focusing useless issue, let’s find the way to increase our economy, focus on our education find the way to improve our educational system
Brain drain mostly happen in a community while the people want to live as they dreamed. They want to live professionally. Making some economic improvement and investing for people to stay.
2 Likes
The Taliban came from 2021 in Afghanistan
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the Taliban came from 2021 in Afghanistan. However, there is no evidence provided to support this claim. The evidence provided, which is ‘Kandahar, Afghanistan’, does not mention anything about the Taliban coming from 2021. Therefore, there is no factual basis for the claim made in the given text.
The Taliban should give people their rights
is probably not correct.
The given text is a statement expressing an opinion or belief, rather than a factual statement. It does not provide any specific information or evidence to support the claim that the Taliban should give people their rights. Therefore, it cannot be fact-checked.
The Taliban should prevent the emigration of youths and brain drain
is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because the Taliban have actually called on Western countries to stop evacuating and resettling educated and skilled Afghans abroad, which contradicts the statement that the Taliban should prevent the emigration of youths and brain drain.