The brain drain from Afghanistan has caused the reduction of human capital in the country and the country’s economic growth and political and social development are facing obstacles, there is an urgent need to create a government strategy for return and reabsorption. Specialized, educated and experienced people are seen. So that people who return to the country do not have to worry about the uncertain future in the post-return stage.
The country’s political development is facing obstacles
is probably not correct.
The given text is subjective and does not provide any specific information or evidence to support the claim that the country’s political development is facing obstacles. It is a general statement without any factual basis.
There is an urgent need to create a government strategy for return and reabsorption
is probably not correct.
The given text does not provide any specific information or evidence to support the claim that there is an urgent need to create a government strategy for return and reabsorption. Without any supporting evidence, it is difficult to determine the factuality of this statement.
Okay but what do you think what the government should do ?
Do you think people who left the country will return back? If yes, which specific strategies may work?
people who left the country will return back
is probably not correct.
The given text states that people who left the country will return back. This statement is not supported by the provided evidences. The evidences mention that some people may return home after living abroad, but it does not imply that all people who left the country will return back. Therefore, the given text is not factual.
This is a fact that everyone will not return back and nobody can tell who may or may not, because I think if there were a chance nobody would choose to stay!
everyone will not return back
is probably not correct.
The given text ‘everyone will not return back’ is not factual because the provided evidences suggest that some companies are making efforts to get employees to return to the office and that a significant percentage of executives prefer to work from the office every day. These evidences contradict the statement in the given text.
For sure if the government situation become good and all the facilities are exist for people and if they can work,education,security and good economy are exist so they wil return back to there country.
Another way is to create a retirnee support system. Develop programs that offer support to afghan migrants who voluntarily choose to return to their home country including reintegration assistance and job placement.
government situation become good
is probably not correct.
The given text ‘government situation become good’ is not specific enough to determine its factuality. It does not provide any context or evidence to support the claim. Therefore, we cannot determine whether it is factual or not based on the given text alone.
education is exist
is probably not correct.
The given text ‘education is exist’ is not factual because it does not accurately represent the concept of education. The provided evidences clearly state that education is the transmission of knowledge, skills, and character traits, and that schools exist to provide education to children. Therefore, the given text is not factual.
security is exist
is probably not correct.
The given text ‘security is exist’ is not factually correct. The phrase ‘security is exist’ does not make grammatical sense and does not convey a clear meaning. It seems to be a grammatical error or a typo.
they wil return back to there country
is probably not correct.
The given text contains a factual error. The correct phrase is ‘they will return back to their country’. This is supported by the evidence that migrants should only go back safely and voluntarily, and that more migrants are returning home by choice or by force.
Can you please name which companies you are talking about? Because most of companies are stopped working either trying to make their activities less.
Most companies are stopped working
is probably not correct.
The given text states that most companies are stopped working, which implies that the majority of companies have ceased operations. However, the provided evidence does not support this claim. The evidence states that 66% of employers currently require employees to work from the office, indicating that a significant number of companies are still operational. Additionally, the evidence mentions that only 16% of companies hire remote-only workers, suggesting that the majority of companies still have employees working in physical offices. Therefore, the given text is not supported by the provided evidence.
Dear friends, I have a question from you. If currently government continousely to last and the situation corrept more than yet, do suggest ti migrate youth?
the situation corrupts more than yet
is probably not correct.
The given text does not provide any specific information or claim that can be fact-checked. It is a vague statement without any evidence or context. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the factuality of the text.
suggest to migrate youth
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it lacks specific information or evidence to support the suggestion of migrating youth. The provided evidence states that youth may choose or be forced to migrate for various reasons such as poverty, violence, conflict, war, or climate change. However, it does not explicitly suggest that youth should migrate.
People can create Social Support Programs. To establish social safety nets to provide assistance to vulnerable populations, reducing the push factors for illegal migration.
Why shouldn’t they offer programs to people living here? There are thousands living here with no income and any support. People who left the country they already has a job, they are settled and are under the fully support of country they are living.
People who left the country already have a job
is probably not correct.
The given text states that people who left the country already have a job. However, the provided evidences suggest that this statement is not universally True. The evidences mention that financial concerns are one of the biggest reasons why people don’t quit their jobs before finding new employment. Additionally, it is mentioned that a majority of those who quit a job in 2021 and are not retired say they are now employed, either full-time or part-time. However, this does not imply that all people who leave the country already have a job. Therefore, the given text is not universally factual.
They are settled and are under the fully support of the country they are living
is probably not correct.
The given text states that ‘They are settled and are under the fully support of the country they are living’. However, there is no evidence provided to support this claim. The evidences mention settled status and pre-settled status, but there is no mention of being under the full support of the country they are living in. Therefore, the claim made in the given text is not supported by the provided evidences.
No, more important than retires are youth who sat at home unemployment with great educations.
Young people need more support and encouredgement.
Retires are not more important than youth who sat at home unemployment with great educations
is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because it makes a generalization that retirees are not more important than youth who are unemployed with great educations. However, this statement is not supported by the provided evidences. The evidences mention that the less-educated are more likely to be unemployed for longer periods of time throughout their careers, and that unemployment is generally higher among young people than prime age adults. Therefore, it is incorrect to claim that retirees are not more important than unemployed youth with great educations.
Do you think that recognizing the Taliban can help prevent brain drain?