We are talking in a context named Afghanistan maybe this statistics matches other countries but in Afghanistan you will not find out someone who works remote.
You are completely right. In general the rights must reach the rightful. there should be feeling and pity.
No, if the taliban recognized on that case they will continue this situation without any changes.
There should be feeling
is probably not correct.
The given text is a statement that does not provide any specific information or make any claims. It is more of a general statement or opinion rather than a factual statement. Therefore, it cannot be determined if the given text is factual or not based on the provided evidence.
The Taliban will continue the situation without any changes
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the Taliban will continue the situation without any changes. However, the provided evidences suggest that the situation in Afghanistan continues to deteriorate and the Taliban-led insurgency retains control. Additionally, the evidences mention that the Taliban have not changed their posture or policies toward women despite international condemnation. These evidences contradict the claim made in the given text.
We can use from Regional Cooperations.
By engaging neighbor countries and regional partners to collectively address migration challenges and to find solutions that benefit all parties involved.
We all know that the de facto authorities restricted the opportunities for young generation but we are still having alternative ways to prevent brain drain crisis.
We are still having alternative ways to prevent brain drain crisis
is probably not correct.
The given text does not make any specific claims or provide any evidence to support the statement that there are alternative ways to prevent brain drain crisis. Therefore, it is difficult to determine the factuality of the text based on the provided evidences.
No at all! If all of them sit on government chair surely, even the dream of youth development should be seen. So its better to remove the Taliban. They are just Unknown government that no one accept them.
All of them sitting on government chair
is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because it states that all of them are sitting on government chair, which is not True according to the provided evidences. The evidences state that government members sit on the right of the Speaker’s chair with ministers on the front bench, while opposition legislators take up benches to the left.
The Taliban are just Unknown government
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the Taliban are just an unknown government, which contradicts the provided evidences. The evidences describe the Taliban as a predominantly Pashtun, Islamic fundamentalist group that emerged in the early 1990s and controlled most of Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001. Therefore, the given text is non-factual.
No one accepts the Taliban
is probably not correct.
The given text states that no one accepts the Taliban. However, the provided evidence states that three countries - Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates - recognized the Taliban as the country’s lawful government. This evidence contradicts the given text, indicating a factual error.
Yes but do you think that the neighbors will help Afg without any condition?
You are right but which alternative ways you prefer?
I think this is a personal question and if I consider that the current conditions will continue or the restrictions will increase; I will take my bachelor’s degree and become a refugee in another country, and this is an undeniable fact.
By public Awareness and Information Campaigns we can raise awareness about the risks and challenges associated with illegal immigration, including human trafficking and dangerous journeys. And disseminate accurate information about available legal pathways for migration.
Don’t you think our neighbor countries sometimes make parties with the current authority in Afghanistan, as Iran was supporting them but regarding the water (aqaba) their relation became worst because TBS don’t respect to any region or country.
Their relation regarding the water (aqaba) became worst
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the relation regarding the water (aqaba) became worst. However, there is no evidence provided to support this claim. The provided evidences only mention the current status of surface water quality and the high salinity of Aqaba Gulf water, but they do not mention any worsening relation regarding the water.
You are right. We need more supports from another sides. World community and United nation are responsible to support us and have cooperations with other political stakeholders. We are impower lonely.
You are right
is probably not correct.
The given text is a simple statement without any specific factual claims. It is a subjective opinion rather than a factual statement.
United nation is responsible to support us
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the United Nations is responsible to support us. However, the provided evidences do not mention any responsibility of the United Nations to support the United States or any other country. Therefore, there is no evidence to support the factual accuracy of the given text.
Right!
What your proposition?
What your proposition?
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it is not clear what proposition is being referred to. The text does not provide any context or specific information about the proposition.