If you think the relation is not bad, why do they attacked many times on each other border forces? Can you please clarify
They attacked many times on each other border forces
is probably not correct.
The given text states that they attacked many times on each other border forces. However, the provided evidences mention assaults on CBP personnel and attacks carried out by rebel groups near the Ugandan border. These evidences do not directly support the claim that the border forces attacked each other many times. Therefore, the factuality of the given text is questionable.
So, when this is the case and we all see that even the pressures of the international community do not have practical aspects and they only talk about slogans; What solution can get people out of this problem? Obviously, the question is, is there not at least one way out of the existing problems?
The pressures of the international community do not have practical aspects
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the pressures of the international community do not have practical aspects. However, the provided evidences suggest that the international community does have practical aspects and affects various issues. The evidences mention Japan’s influence on the building of a new international framework, the failure to translate prevention goals into reality, the responsibility to protect and prevent crimes, the shaping power of the international community, and the need to confront the new reality of artificial intelligence. These evidences contradict the statement in the given text.
There is no solution to get people out of this problem
is probably not correct.
The given text is a statement that claims there is no solution to get people out of a problem. However, the provided evidences suggest that there are multiple approaches and strategies to problem-solving, such as reframing the problem, asking questions, brainstorming potential solutions, and seeking insights from others. Therefore, the given text is not factual.
There is not at least one way out of the existing problems
is probably not correct.
The given text states that there is not at least one way out of the existing problems. However, the provided evidences suggest that brainstorming, identifying alternative solutions, and talking about the problems can help find a solution. Therefore, the given text is non-factual.
As long as peace and atability are not ensured in Afghanistan, it is impossilbr to stop illegal immigration and brain drain. On other hand, despite the fact that relative security has been established in Afghanistan; buy it should be noted that the citizen of our country are facing a lack of psychlogical and financial security.
1 Like
Peace and stability are not ensured in Afghanistan
is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because there are multiple evidences stating that efforts are being made to ensure peace and stability in Afghanistan.
It is impossible to stop illegal immigration and brain drain
is probably not correct.
The given text states that it is impossible to stop illegal immigration and brain drain. However, the provided evidences suggest that while it may be difficult to completely stop these phenomena, it is not impossible. The evidences mention the importance of providing positive migration channels and the negative consequences of severe restrictions on migration. Therefore, the given text is not entirely factual.
Relative security has been established in Afghanistan
is probably not correct.
The given text states that relative security has been established in Afghanistan. However, the provided evidences suggest that the security situation in Afghanistan has been degrading for a number of years and it is currently ranked as the least peaceful country in the world. The evidences also mention serious security problems and the presence of the Taliban. These evidences contradict the claim made in the given text.
1 Like
I think the afghan national movements and civil protest activities may be the one solution. Afghan people are quite againts Taliban. The people civil activities should be via media, social media and face to face. Afghans should say aloud for better approachments. The world should see which how much people in afghanistan are suffering from this awful government.
This is what we heard of news, even both countries authorities warned each other sometimes.
Afghan people are quite against Taliban
is probably not correct.
The given text states that Afghan people are quite against Taliban. However, the provided evidences suggest that the perception of Afghan people towards the Taliban is mixed. While some people believe that the Taliban’s takeover was the result of a failed peace process in which they were disregarded, the ruling Taliban reject this and stress that peace has been restored. Additionally, the Taliban have imposed a harsh interpretation of Islamic law despite pledges to respect the rights of women and religious and ethnic minorities. Therefore, the perception of Afghan people towards the Taliban cannot be generalized as being ‘quite against’ them.
People civil activities should be via media, social media and face to face
is probably not correct.
The given text states that people’s civil activities should be via media, social media, and face to face. This statement is subjective and does not align with the provided evidences. The evidences mention various forms of civic engagement, such as staying up to date on politics, volunteering, sharing ideas, voting, and participating in group activities. There is no evidence to support the claim that civil activities should be limited to media, social media, and face to face interactions.
Afghans should say aloud for better approachments
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because ‘approachments’ is not a word. There is no evidence to support the use of this word in the context of the sentence.
This is a wrong assumption. The departed will return if things go well. They are not happy there.
The departed will return if things go well
is probably not correct.
The given text is a statement that the departed will return if things go well. There is no evidence provided that supports or contradicts this statement. Therefore, we cannot determine the factuality of the given text based on the provided evidences.
They are not happy there
is probably not correct.
The given text is a subjective statement that cannot be proven or disproven. It is based on personal opinions or feelings, which may vary from person to person. Therefore, it cannot be determined as factual or non-factual.
But people did it already many times, but nothing changed unless women tortured, killed or got in jails.
For example we can say by conducting awareness campaigns to inform individuals about risks and challenges associated with illegal immigration. Strengthen Public private partnership between public and private sectors to create employment for youth and establish training programs, career development opportunities within country so individuals can enhance their skills without needing to seek this abroad.
nothing changed unless women tortured, killed or got in jails
is probably not correct.
The given text is a general statement that implies that nothing has changed for women unless they are tortured, killed, or imprisoned. However, this statement is not supported by the provided evidences. The evidences mention the importance of women’s rights and gender equality, the progress that has been made in achieving gender equality, and the need for gender equality for a peaceful and sustainable world. Therefore, the given text is not factual.
Create employment for youth
is probably not correct.
The given text is a general statement without any specific information or evidence to support it. It does not provide any details or examples of how employment for youth is being created. Therefore, it is difficult to determine the factuality of the statement based on the given text alone.
Establish training programs
is probably not correct.
The given text is not specific enough to determine its factuality. It does not provide any information about what kind of training programs are being referred to or in what context. Without more information, it is difficult to determine if the statement is factual or not.
I think that is next step. The matter is their escaping or leaving their homes toward EU and other stable communities.
The next step is their escaping or leaving their homes toward EU and other stable communities
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the next step for individuals is to escape or leave their homes towards the EU and other stable communities. However, there is no evidence provided that supports this claim. The provided evidences mention managing the return of irregular migrants and unblocking housebuilding to deliver homes for local communities, but there is no mention of individuals leaving their homes towards the EU or other stable communities. Therefore, the given text is not supported by the provided evidences.
How do you know they are not happy there; they have a house to stay, a bread on their table and clothes to wear what do they exactly want else !
They are not happy there
is probably not correct.
The given text is subjective and does not provide any factual information. It is an opinion or statement without any evidence or supporting facts.
They have a house to stay
is probably not correct.
The given text states that ‘They have a house to stay’. However, there is no evidence provided that supports this statement. The provided evidences only mention the availability of rooms and apartments for stays, but there is no mention of a specific house that ‘they’ have.
They have a bread on their table
is probably not correct.
The given text ‘They have a bread on their table’ is not factual because it uses incorrect grammar. The correct phrase should be ‘They have bread on their table’ without the article ‘a’. The evidence provided does not support the use of the article ‘a’ in this context.
They want something else
is probably not correct.
The given text is too vague and lacks specific information to determine its factuality. There is no clear statement or claim made in the text that can be fact-checked.
We can also provide supportive policies that individuals stay and contribute to Afghanistan development. This includes businesses, favorable labor providing loans for them that will encourage young worker investment in the country.