The government is responsible to fund our talent
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it states that the government is responsible for funding talent, but the provided evidences indicate that talent management and funding are typically the responsibility of HR departments and talent managers within organizations.
Yes as you mentioned the government is the main institution but international organizations and private sectors also play a significant role.
government is the main institution
is probably not correct.
The given text states that government is the main institution. However, the provided evidences state that the five major social institutions are family, education, religion, government (political), and the economy. This contradicts the given text, suggesting that government is not the main institution.
One of the most effective ways to avoid this problem to build good relationship with people.
One of the most effective ways to avoid this problem is to build good relationship with people
is probably not correct.
The given text is stating that building good relationships with people is one of the most effective ways to avoid problems. However, the provided evidences suggest that problem-solving methods and techniques are more effective in solving and preventing problems. Therefore, the given text is not factual.
Yes this is right that young generation are more in pressure everyone are disappointed from homeland and its governement no one can promote no one can develop there talent and serve for there homeland .
Young generation are more in pressure
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it makes a general statement without providing any evidence or specific information to support it.
Everyone are disappointed from homeland and its government
is probably not correct.
The given text contains a factual error. The correct form should be ‘Everyone is disappointed with homeland and its government.’ The use of ‘are’ instead of ‘is’ is grammatically incorrect.
No one can develop their talent
is probably not correct.
The given text states that no one can develop their talent, but the provided evidences suggest otherwise. The evidences mention that while talent is something innate, an interest can help someone find their talents. Additionally, the evidences provide steps and techniques for developing talent, such as identifying strengths and weaknesses, setting goals, and finding mentors. Therefore, the given text is not factual.
No one can serve for their homeland
is probably not correct.
The given text states that no one can serve for their homeland. However, the provided evidences suggest that all qualified Americans can serve their country in various ways, such as joining the military or becoming Peace Corps Volunteers. Therefore, the given text is not factual.
We can get help form diplomacy and C
Collaboration systems.
By collaborate with foreign governments and international organizations to address the root causes of migration and to seek support for development initiatives within Afghanistan.
It will be change, but I can analyze whether the situation will change fo the better or for the worse.
Brain drain usually happens when skilled individuals and professionals leave the home countries (in most cases, developing nations) and go elsewhere to take advantage of better opportunities. Like our people that they left there homeland for better live and seek a secure place for there shelves.
It will be change
is probably not correct.
The given text ‘It will be change’ is grammatically incorrect. The correct form should be ‘It will be changed’. The evidence ‘As a mantle, you will roll them up, and they will be changed; but you are the same’ supports the correction.
I can analyze whether the situation will change
is probably not correct.
The given text is a statement that the assistant can analyze whether the situation will change. This statement does not make any specific claims or provide any evidence to support its accuracy or inaccuracy. Therefore, it cannot be determined whether the statement is factual or not based on the provided evidences.
the situation will change for the better
is probably not correct.
The given text does not make any specific claims or provide any information that can be fact-checked. It is a general statement without any evidence or context. Therefore, it cannot be determined whether the text is factual or not based on the provided evidences.
for my opinion banning intellectuals from leaving the country can prevent them from escaping.
People left their homeland for better live
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it states that people left their homeland for a better life without providing any specific reasons or evidence to support this claim.
Banning intellectuals from leaving the country can prevent them from escaping
is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because there is no evidence to support the claim that banning intellectuals from leaving the country can prevent them from escaping. The provided evidences do not mention anything about banning intellectuals from leaving the country as a means of preventing their escape.
Yes you are absolutely right, but what do you think is the solution to prevent brain drain ?
You think the solution to prevent brain drain
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it does not provide any evidence or reasoning to support the claim that the mentioned solution can prevent brain drain. The provided evidences suggest different measures to reduce brain drain, such as increasing investments, offering competitive wages, legal and social reform, improving resources, and providing affordable housing solutions.
But in this situation and with kind governement no one want to come back to country becouse no one have body security they are insecure and disappointed persone from governement.
No one wants to come back to the country because no one has body security
is probably not correct.
The given text is a general statement that claims that no one wants to come back to the country because no one has body security. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence provided. The evidences mention various reasons why people may not want to go back to their country, such as cultural differences, lifestyle preferences, job opportunities, and personal familiarity with their home country. Therefore, the given text lacks factual basis.
No one wants to come back to the country because no one is insecure
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it makes a generalization that no one wants to come back to the country because no one is insecure. However, the provided evidences suggest that there are multiple reasons why people may not want to come back to their country, such as job security, healthcare, and work-life balance. The evidences also mention that some people leave home to get a job or an education, which contradicts the claim that no one wants to come back.
No one wants to come back to the country because no one is a disappointed person from the government
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it makes a generalization that no one wants to come back to the country because no one is a disappointed person from the government. However, the provided evidences suggest that there could be several reasons why foreigners living abroad may choose not to return to their homeland, such as cultural shock, loneliness, and disruption.
I don’t agree with you . Because this is not the solution. We should be in Afghanistan
We must improve in healthcare and social services
By improve access to healthcare and social services to enhance the quality of life for Afghan citizens. And this could include efforts to combat diseases, improve maternal and child health, and provide mental health support.