We should be in Afghanistan
is probably not correct.
The given text is a statement without any specific information or context. It is not possible to determine its factuality based on the provided evidences.
Enhance the quality of life for Afghan citizens
is probably not correct.
The given text is a general statement that does not provide any specific information or evidence to support its claim. Without any evidence, it is difficult to determine the factuality of the statement.
Do you suggest a regular solution yourself?
Another important point should also be remembered that brain drain sometimes occurs due to competition between countries, countries that are improved in the field of progress, science, technology, social welfare, the educated people mostly refers to the same countries, because the field of progress is more for them, that usually these types of migrations take place in two types, either permanent or temporary.
in last twenty years, Afghanistan situation was relatively better and the field of theorizing and freedom of expression was favorable, but a large number of scientists migrated from Afghanistan to advanced countries.
Afghanistan situation was relatively better in the last twenty years
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the situation in Afghanistan was relatively better in the last twenty years. However, the provided evidence states that the war in Afghanistan lasted for 20 years and ended with the Taliban taking over the capital. This contradicts the claim made in the given text.
A large number of scientists migrated from Afghanistan to advanced countries
is probably not correct.
The given text states that a large number of scientists migrated from Afghanistan to advanced countries. However, there is no evidence provided to support this claim. The evidence only mentions that some Afghans have relocated to the US under the Special Immigrant Visas program, but it does not specify if these individuals are scientists. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to determine the factuality of the given text.
Foreign countries should not give visas to educated people.
And this can also be a way to prevent brain drain.
Maybe this way be useful for our country.
Foreign countries should not give visas to educated people
is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because there is no evidence to support the claim that foreign countries should not give visas to educated people. On the contrary, the provided evidences suggest that foreign countries, such as the U.S. and Japan, have visa programs specifically designed to attract highly skilled and educated individuals.
Exactly, the United Nations and the international community play an important role in this issue.
Yes you’re right but as you’re already aware after many protesting in the past there were many violence cases related to women protestors, they were detained arrested and even killed by de facto special forces so now they cannot dare to speak out.
You’re right also the government should make some different rules which will be useful for afghan people
Women protestors were detained, arrested, and even killed by de facto special forces
is probably not correct.
The given text states that women protestors were detained, arrested, and even killed by de facto special forces. The provided evidences mention instances where individuals were detained by de facto Taliban security forces before being killed. This contradicts the given text, as it implies that the individuals responsible for the detentions and killings were the Taliban, not de facto special forces. Therefore, the given text is non-factual.
Women protestors cannot dare to speak out now
is probably not correct.
The given text is a statement that claims women protestors cannot dare to speak out now. To determine the factuality of this statement, we can refer to the provided evidences. The evidences mention the right to assemble and express views through protest, which is protected by the First Amendment. This suggests that women protestors do have the ability to speak out and protest. Therefore, we can conclude that the given text is non-factual.
You’re right
is probably not correct.
The given text ‘You’re right’ is a simple statement and does not make any factual claims. It is a subjective statement that can vary depending on the context and the person saying it. Therefore, it cannot be determined as factual or non-factual.
the government should make some different rules
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it does not provide any specific information or evidence to support the claim that the government should make different rules. The provided evidences, on the other hand, emphasize the importance of laws and regulations in maintaining peace, justice, equality, and economic progress. Therefore, the given text lacks factual basis.
the rules will be useful for Afghan people
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the rules will be useful for Afghan people. However, it does not specify what rules it is referring to. Without further information, it is difficult to determine the factuality of the statement.
I do agree with you we should be in Afghanistan
But what should we do in here to improve our education, schools are closed what’s the solution
we should be in Afghanistan
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it states that ‘we should be in Afghanistan’ without providing any evidence or context to support this claim.
schools are closed
is probably not correct.
The given text ‘schools are closed’ is a general statement and does not specify the context or time frame. It is possible that schools are closed in some locations or during certain periods, but not universally. The provided evidences mention that schools have been closed globally due to COVID-19 lockdowns, but it also states that most school districts have closed for the summer and will reopen for the next school year. Therefore, the factuality of the given text cannot be determined without more specific information.
So it is very important for a human who live in a society that know their future and their fate, till they know how should make his or her future.
1 Like
It is important for a human to know their future and fate
is probably not correct.
The given text states that it is important for a human to know their future and fate. However, the provided evidences suggest that most people would rather not know what fate brings them in the future. This contradicts the statement in the given text.
Humans should know how to make their future
is probably not correct.
The given text is a general statement that humans should know how to make their future. While it is True that humans have the ability to think about the future and make decisions to shape their future, the text does not provide any specific evidence or reasoning to support this claim. Therefore, we cannot determine the factuality of the given text based on the provided evidences.
We should read our history and the abroad country history who are were like Afghanistan.
It is better to research, study and review the country’s history to find a logical solution.
We should read our history
is probably not correct.
The given text is a statement that does not provide any specific information or claim. It is a general statement that suggests the importance of reading history. Therefore, it cannot be considered as factual or non-factual.
We should read the abroad country history
is probably not correct.
The given text contains a grammatical error. The phrase ‘the abroad country history’ is incorrect. The correct phrase should be ‘the history of the abroad country’.
The abroad country were like Afghanistan
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the abroad country is like Afghanistan. However, it does not provide any evidence or reasoning to support this claim. Without any supporting evidence, it is difficult to determine the factuality of this statement.
Dissemination is one way. Disseminate accurate information about available legal pathways for migration.
Dissemination is one way
is probably not correct.
The given text states that dissemination is one way, but the provided evidence contradicts this by stating that dissemination involves sending information through various channels. Therefore, the given text is non-factual.