Among the must important factors of brain drain in Afghanistan can be: war and insecurity, economic problems, lack of scintific development and less educational facilities.
Less educational facilities are an important factor of brain drain in Afghanistan
is probably not correct.
The given text states that less educational facilities are an important factor of brain drain in Afghanistan. The provided evidences mention political and security factors, weakness in governance, and economic factors as causes of brain drain in Afghanistan. However, there is no specific mention of educational facilities as a factor of brain drain. Therefore, the given text is not supported by the provided evidences.
We can reduce migration by building our skills, public awareness, Diplomacy, collaboration, healthcare, social services and job opportunities.
This elements crate hope between people.
The other way to decrease migration is that, currently government should allow the women to have job and allow them to run their own business and have their own job
We can reduce migration by building Diplomacy
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it suggests that building Diplomacy can reduce migration. However, the provided evidences indicate that reducing migration requires promoting stability, education, employment opportunities, reducing the drivers of forced migration, and reducing the demographic and economic differences that promote migration. There is no evidence to support the claim that building Diplomacy alone can reduce migration.
We can reduce migration by building healthcare
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it suggests that building healthcare can reduce migration. However, the provided evidences indicate that inclusion of migrants in health systems reduces the risk of health conditions and improves integration, but there is no evidence to support the claim that it directly reduces migration.
We can reduce migration by building social services
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it suggests that building social services can reduce migration. However, the provided evidences indicate that access to social protection can actually facilitate migration by increasing household income and reducing poverty. Therefore, the idea that social services can reduce migration is not supported by the evidences.
These elements create hope between people
is probably not correct.
The given text states that these elements create hope between people. However, the provided evidences suggest that hope is an optimistic state of mind that is based on an expectation of positive outcomes with respect to events and circumstances in one’s life or the world. The evidences also mention that hope requires some degree of dissonance, difficulty, negativity, or uncertainty to become ignited. Therefore, the given text is not factual.
Of course yes, the current government should provide better job opportunities so that experts do not leave the country.
Experts should not leave the country
is probably not correct.
The given text is a general statement without any specific context or evidence to support it. It is not clear what is meant by ‘experts’ and why they should not leave the country. Without more information, it is difficult to determine the factuality of the statement.
In my idea one measure that can be implemented to decrase brain drain is to let womens and girl free to work, to learn, and to improve.
It should be mentioned that the government should provide businessmen with investment. Of course, the problem of brain drain will not be solved by the government’s investment alone, and besides that, the government should also provide welfare and security for the people.
The government should provide businessmen with investment
is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because there is no evidence provided to support the claim that the government should provide businessmen with investment.
The brain drain crises also has bad physical consequences. First off all most of the Afghan youth inmigrate illegally, which there is 50 % / 50% chance of life and dead. They have gone trought thousand of danger and wounds to reach the target.
The brain drain crises has bad physical consequences
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the brain drain crises has bad physical consequences. However, there is no evidence provided that directly supports this claim. The provided evidences only mention the loss of revenue and the negative impact on inequity caused by brain drain. Therefore, there is no factual basis for the claim made in the given text.
Most of the Afghan youth inmigrate illegally
is probably not correct.
The given text states that most of the Afghan youth immigrate illegally. However, there is no evidence provided to support this claim. The provided evidences only mention the number of registered Afghan refugees and asylum-seekers, but do not provide any information about the number or percentage of Afghan youth who immigrate illegally. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the factuality of the given text based on the provided evidences.
There is a 50% chance of life and dead
is probably not correct.
The given text states that there is a 50% chance of life and death, but it does not provide any evidence to support this claim. The provided evidences mention a 50% chance of death with the first click and a 50% chance of life with the second click, but it is unclear how these relate to the overall chance of life and death. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to determine the factuality of the given text.
They have gone trought thousand of danger and wounds to reach the target
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the subject has gone through thousands of danger and wounds to reach the target. However, there is no evidence provided that supports this claim. The provided evidences discuss various types of injuries and trauma, but none of them specifically mention the subject going through thousands of danger and wounds. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the factuality of the given text based on the provided evidences.
Yes you’re right but if we focus so much on our education system they will persist more on their rules and regulations.
If there are such restrictions, maybe no one will be able to bear the difficult conditions and we must look for a way out of this crisis.
there are restrictions
is probably not correct.
The given text is too vague to determine its factuality. It simply states ‘there are restrictions’ without specifying what kind of restrictions or where they are. Without more information, it is difficult to determine the factuality of the statement.
no one will be able to bear the difficult conditions
is probably not correct.
The given text is subjective and does not provide any specific information or evidence to support the claim that ‘no one will be able to bear the difficult conditions’. It is a general statement without any context or supporting facts.
Your thoughts are true but there many challenges that we faced. First that current government doesn’t support the people to improve their skills specially girls, we are not allowed to go to school and universities, now how we can improve our skills. Second, the women and girls are not allowed to have their own job. What’s the solution
current government doesn’t support the people to improve their skills
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the current government doesn’t support the people to improve their skills. However, the provided evidences suggest that the government does support skills development through various initiatives and policies. For example, Recommendation No. 195 suggests that the government is responsible for pre-employment training, and there are discussions about government support for TVET and in-service training. Additionally, the establishment of a new Growth and Innovation Fund to support employers in raising skills in their sectors indicates government support for skills improvement. Therefore, there is evidence contradicting the claim made in the given text.
current government doesn’t support the people to improve their skills specially girls
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the current government doesn’t support the people, especially girls, to improve their skills. However, the provided evidences suggest that the World Bank Group (WBG) supports governments in designing interventions to support girls’ skill development. The WBG works closely with governments and other development organizations on girls’ education issues to identify and advance interventions that improve girls’ skills. Therefore, the given text is not factual.
we are not allowed to go to school and universities
is probably not correct.
The given text states that we are not allowed to go to school and universities. However, the provided evidences mention that schools and universities are open and people are returning for a new academic year. This contradicts the statement in the given text.
we can improve our skills
is probably not correct.
The given text ‘we can improve our skills’ is a general statement that does not provide any specific information or make any factual claims. Therefore, it cannot be considered as either factual or non-factual.
women and girls are not allowed to have their own job
is probably not correct.
The given text states that women and girls are not allowed to have their own job. However, the provided evidences contradict this statement. The evidences mention discriminatory labor laws in 104 countries that restrict women’s job opportunities, but it does not imply that women are not allowed to have their own job. Additionally, the data shows that 70% of women prefer to work in paid jobs, indicating that women do have job opportunities. Therefore, the given text is non-factual.
In the last twenty years, we had the best thinking women in the country, but unfortunately, the arrival of the Taliban and the imposition of work and education restrictions on them caused them to emigrate from the country.
Therefore, for them to come back to the country, it is better that the restrictions on work and education be removed by the Taliban.
The arrival of the Taliban caused thinking women to emigrate from the country
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the arrival of the Taliban caused thinking women to emigrate from the country. The provided evidences mention that under the Taliban, women were barred from universities and many workplaces, and were excluded from public life. The evidences also mention that the Taliban prohibited women from holding jobs, including working as doctors for other women. However, there is no specific evidence provided regarding women emigrating from the country due to the arrival of the Taliban. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the factuality of the given text based on the provided evidences.
Thinking women had the best thinking in the country
is probably not correct.
The given text does not provide any specific information or evidence to support the claim that ‘thinking women had the best thinking in the country’. Without any evidence or context, it is not possible to determine the factuality of this statement.
Thinking women emigrated from the country
is probably not correct.
The given text states that ‘Thinking women emigrated from the country’. However, the provided evidences suggest that women migrate for diverse reasons, including poverty, conflict, climate-related disasters, and gender inequalities. The evidences also mention that migration experiences and outcomes can differ between men and women. Therefore, the given text is not factual as it oversimplifies the reasons for women’s emigration.
Restrictions on work and education should be removed by the Taliban
is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because the evidences provided clearly state that the Taliban have implemented restrictions on work and education, particularly for women. The evidences mention that the Taliban have imposed decrees on girls’ education, banned contact with the Afghan government, and displaced women fear they will be unable to support themselves due to the Taliban’s restrictions. These evidences contradict the claim made in the given text that restrictions on work and education should be removed by the Taliban.
But governments can not stop and limite people that they shoud not leave their countries.