You are right, so what do you think, whether the current government will provide better study and education for teenagers in the future or not ?
the current government will provide better study and education for teenagers in the future
is probably not correct.
The given text is a statement about the future, so it cannot be factually verified at the moment. It is a subjective claim made by the current government.
the current government will not provide better study and education for teenagers in the future
is probably not correct.
The given text is a subjective statement and cannot be proven or disproven with the provided evidences. The evidences talk about the importance of education and the government’s efforts in providing an equitable foundation for learning, but they do not specifically address whether the current government will provide better study and education for teenagers in the future.
Yes exactly we are living a very tough life at the current situation in Afghanistan so now we should somehow support each other and find a good solution.
This is the most important discussion; Because both the gates of schools and universities are closed to girls and the work area has been limited.
1 Like
We are living a tough life in Afghanistan
is probably not correct.
The given text is subjective and does not provide any specific information or evidence to support the claim of living a tough life in Afghanistan. It is a general statement without any factual basis.
The work area has been limited
is probably not correct.
The given text does not provide enough information to determine its factuality. It simply states that the work area has been limited without specifying what the limits are or providing any evidence to support this claim.
However we show more endurance to our education system they will provide more rules for us and show persist that why some solutions have challenges.
Our education system will provide more rules for girls
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it makes a general statement about the education system providing more rules for girls without any evidence or context to support it.
Our education system will show persist
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it lacks specific information and context. It does not provide any evidence or explanation to support the claim that the education system will persist.
We should read different part about the brain drain and the theories of young people, elites, and students in the form of a scientific article can also help to solve this crisis.
We should read different part about the brain drain
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it does not provide any specific information about the brain drain. It is a vague statement that does not provide any evidence or explanation.
The theories of young people, elites, and students can help to solve this crisis
is probably not correct.
The given text is stating that the theories of young people, elites, and students can help to solve a crisis. However, there is no evidence provided that directly supports this claim. The provided evidences discuss issues related to education, economic growth, and the existence of genius in all communities, but none of them specifically mention the theories of young people, elites, and students as a solution to a crisis. Therefore, the given text is not supported by the provided evidences.
Our education system will provide more rules for us
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it states that the education system will provide more rules for us, which is not supported by the provided evidences. The evidences suggest that the education system needs to be reevaluated and adjusted to better prepare students with employable skills, indicating a need for change rather than more rules.
In my idea brain drain is the biggest problem in Afghanistan. There are lots of reasons for this problem but the bolded problem is job
It doesn’t have any mistake it’s totally right.
Brain drain is the biggest problem in Afghanistan
is probably not correct.
The given text is a subjective statement and does not provide any evidence to support the claim that brain drain is the biggest problem in Afghanistan. The provided evidence talks about the humanitarian crisis and food insecurity in Afghanistan, but it does not specifically mention brain drain as the biggest problem.
The bolded problem is job
is probably not correct.
The given text is not factual because it states that the bolded problem is job, which is not supported by any of the provided evidences.
Yes exactly what you mentioned is completely true.
What do you think, what will be the result of brain drain crisis?
The result of brain drain crisis is uncertain.
is probably not correct.
The given text is subjective and does not provide any evidence or reasoning to support the claim that the result of brain drain crisis is uncertain. It is important to note that brain drain crisis can have negative effects on the areas affected, as mentioned in the provided evidence.
Yes, I agree with your opinion, one of the ways to prevent brain drain is to provide education for all the citizens of the country, male and female. It is a source of hope for the people.
It’s possible especially for our good future and government can do it.
So what do you suggest, what should be done to promote job creation in Afghanistan?