Day 3: Afghanistan Future: Government Recognition_TeamA

This issue was recorded in the Doha Agreement before the fall of the Republic, and assurances from the Taliban and the US were exchanged between the parties. So, saying that this meeting will facilitate the process of interaction with the Taliban is nothing more than demagoguery, and it is a part of the erosive competition of the powers involved in the issue of Afghanistan under the rule of the Taliban, whose security and diplomatic image has been clarified until now.

I appreciate your input and your insights on the current situation in Afghanistan. It seems like you have concerns about the effectiveness of the meeting in facilitating the process of interaction with the Taliban. Could you elaborate on why you believe this meeting might be seen as demagoguery? What specific aspects do you think might be contributing to the erosion of competition among the powers involved?

In my opinion, the future of Afghanistan with our current government will be a relatively long period of insecurity, internal conflicts, economic, social and political stagnation in this country.

Also, the recognition of the Taliban government can increase humanitarian aid and development aid, it facilitates the recognition of the provision of humanitarian aid and development aid by the international community. This support can help address pressing issues such as poverty, health care, education and infrastructure development.

I appreciate your perspective on recognizing the Taliban government and its potential impact on humanitarian aid and development. Can you elaborate more on how exactly this recognition can facilitate the provision of aid by the international community?

The only solution for this issue is that Taliban leave the country and a legal governoment with onclusion pf all citizens should be formed, the government should consider all standards of a legitimate governoment. only that time we can expect them to be legal annd the international community can trust them.

How distinguished of you to extend your appreciation for my perspective, my dear interlocutor. Indeed, I have keenly observed the trials faced by the Taliban in their governance endeavors. Several areas where they encounter difficulties include establishing inclusive policies, upholding human rights, and fostering economic stability. It is my view that addressing these challenges necessitates adopting a more nuanced approach and embracing constructive dialogue with various stakeholders.

Yes I definitely agree to you that the Taliban’s oppressive regime in Afghanistan has undeniably stripped women of their basic rights and freedoms, leaving them confined to their homes and subjected to a strict set of rules and restrictions that severely limit their ability to participate in society or live fulfilling lives.

1 Like

The only solution for this issue is that Taliban leave the country and a legal governoment with onclusion pf all citizens should be formed, the government should consider all standards of a legitimate governoment. only that time we can expect them to be legal annd the international community can trust

In any case, what is clear from the ambiguous nature of this meeting, not only does it not have an effect on improving the situation in Afghanistan and does not solve the problem, but also if it leads to an agreement to recognize or at least unofficially (de facto) recognize the Taliban. will move the situation to the benefit of the Taliban and to the detriment of the Afghan people and the security of the region

In past 20 years people were hungry too, why people didn’t rise there voices then?

How can international trust in a legal and inclusive government be rebuilt in a country where the Taliban is currently in power?

I think that recognition will provide Afghanistan’s voice in global decision-making processes and allow it to participate in discussions related to issues of global importance.

The Taliban only believe in their old beliefs and do not accept these issues

I Agree with your idea, people can not accept them.i also can not be fortunate about the future of Afghanistan. I always looking for a domistic war within the current situation. As they are always in conflict between themselves.

another solution is in this case, the field of Afghanistan will be the arena of bloody competition between Asian allies and trans-Asian allies for many years. In any case, this game will fail because the era of American unilateralism is over and alternatives for this era have emerged from Chinese and Russian versions.

I appreciate your input and the solution you presented. It seems like you’re suggesting that the competition between Asian and trans-Asian allies in Afghanistan will continue for a long time, and that the era of American unilateralism is drawing to a close, with alternative versions emerging from China and Russia.

Could you please elaborate on how this scenario might play out and what the implications might be? I’d like to understand your perspective more deeply.

Thank you for sharing your perspective on the matter. It’s interesting to explore the dynamics of the Doha Agreement and the exchange of assurances between the Taliban and the US. While some may argue that the upcoming meeting is simply political posturing, it’s crucial to approach these discussions with an open mind and consider the potential avenues for dialogue and constructive engagement. By fostering meaningful interactions, we have the opportunity to address concerns and work towards a better future for Afghanistan.

Hello!
Thanks for shedding light on this. It’s complicated, but I’m all ears for any ideas or solutions you’d like to propose.

I think current government does not want to serve people and country, they are to serve their selves.
If we look to women education and their reasons for closing it. it must be prepared in two years. because two years is enough time for a process.
same in economic section, they are not to help people to get better economy, they are against them instead. we can say taxes increased every year in Taliban government.
so they do not worth to recognize as legal government, they must change their behavior and policy then we can think about recognition.