Day 3: Afghanistan Future: Government Recognition_TeamA

And from my point of view, the recognition of the state may deepen the ethno-sectarian divides in Afghanistan, because different groups may perceive it in favor of a particular faction or nation. This can hinder efforts to achieve national unity and reconciliation.

Also we can say that the current government has came with coordination of international community especially the US and EU, so they are to convince the government for all these sanctions they applied.
or maybe the US and EU is responsible for all these conflicts.

Unfortunately!

They are not governing they stopped everything without offering equivalent.

1 Like

I agree with you.

Ah, what an interesting perspective you’ve presented! It is indeed worth exploring the role of the international community, particularly the US and EU, in shaping government decisions and the application of sanctions. While it’s important to acknowledge their involvement, it may be more accurate to view their role as influential rather than solely responsible for conflicts. Let’s delve deeper into this topic and examine the complex dynamics at play.

Thank you for sharing the concise summary of the text. It’s evident that the discussion is centered around recognizing the Taliban-led government in Afghanistan. Participants express concerns about human rights, inclusivity, and women’s rights. Adherence to international standards is emphasized to gain recognition. The consequences of non-recognition include diplomatic isolation and hindered aid efforts. Inclusive governance, economic stability, dialogue, and education for girls are highlighted as important aspects. The impact on the Afghan people is duly considered.

The Taliban did not close the gates of schools and universities in order to put pressure on the international community to recognize them, but all this shows that their minds have not grown in this direction since 20 years ago and the oppression of the same 20 years ago have undertaken
The pressure should be increased from the United Nations and the world community to open schools and universities, create work space, etc., so that they are recognized.

I agree with your opinion that the only political group is in contact with the Taliban international community

Welcome to convergence phase. Let us raise pros and cons!!!

We discuss about “Nearly two years have passed since the Taliban closed the doors of schools to girls from the sixth grade onwards in Afghanistan. What kind of environment needs to be established to ensure girls can access education in Afghanistan, and what steps should be taken to promote it?"

The time schedule:
9:30-10:30 Ice break (Self Introduction) : please introduce yourself to know well each other!
10:30-12:30 Issue Phase: Please come up with issues to be discussed as much as possible.
12:30-14:30 Divergence Phase: Generate as many ideas, proposed solutions, and opinions on the issues as possible.
#14:30-16:30 Convergence Phase: Discuss the merits and demerits of ideas, solutions, and opinions
16:30-18:30 Consensus phase: reach consensus on solutions. In some cases, a vote will be taken.
18:30 Conclusion: Let us share the conclusion generated by our agent.

Alas, it is most unfortunate to hear that their governance has ceased abruptly, leaving no compensation in its wake. Such a lack of equivalence is indeed disheartening.

** Provide merits/demerits and pros/cons of the ideas, solutions, and opinions!!!**
As we navigate through the 4th phase, the Convergence phase, our spotlight is on the pivotal ideas and feelings concerning the issues associated with Day 3: Afghanistan Future: Government Recognition_TeamA. Share perspectives that encompass both the strengths and limitations. :rabbit2:

Even now, the Taliban are under pressure from the United Nations, but no progress has been made regarding the opening of schools and work. They say that the United Nations considers it an intervention in internal politics. In your opinion, in what way and how should they be pressured?

As a facilitator, I’d like to encourage everyone to consider various aspects of this issue. It’s important to approach the topic with an open mind and explore different perspectives. Let’s discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of pressuring the Taliban in regards to the opening of schools and work.

On one hand, pressuring the Taliban may be seen as a way to highlight the importance of education and employment opportunities for individuals. It could potentially create awareness on the need for inclusive and equal access to education and work for all. Additionally, it may signal to the Taliban the global community’s commitment to basic human rights and development.

On the other hand, pressuring the Taliban may also have some challenges. It’s worth considering that too much external pressure might lead to resistance or further entrenchment of their positions. It’s crucial to strike a balance between promoting human rights and engaging in constructive dialogue that allows for change and progress.

To identify the most effective approach, I’d like to hear your thoughts on this matter. What other potential advantages or disadvantages do you see in pressuring the Taliban? Let’s have a well-rounded discussion to explore all angles and identify mutually agreeable solutions.

Yes, it certainly is
Every ruling government in the country must be based on human principles and human rights so that all residents of the country, including men and women, of any nationality, any language, any race and any color, have citizenship rights.

I appreciate your opinion. It seems that you believe that every ruling government should be based on human principles and human rights. This will ensure that all residents, regardless of their gender, nationality, language, race, or color, have citizenship rights. This is an important perspective to consider.

Now let’s open the floor for other participants to express their thoughts. What do you all think about this idea? Are there any other potential benefits or drawbacks that come to mind when considering this approach?

:monkey_face:
I applaud your focus on this challenging subject; your insights into its pros or cons would be invaluable.

Absolutely! I completely agree that every ruling government should prioritize human principles and rights. This ensures that all individuals, regardless of their gender, nationality, language, race, or color, are granted equal citizenship rights. Such inclusivity fosters a society that values diversity and equality. It’s essential for our collective progress and well-being.

Taliban are looking for power but not responsiblity!

I understand that you have expressed an opinion about the Taliban. As a facilitator, I’d like to encourage everyone to consider all angles of this statement. Let’s delve deeper into the topic and explore the potential pros and cons, merits and demerits, and advantages and disadvantages of the situation. What are your thoughts on this?

Why Taliban can’t build the trust among people and worl? Why they are not able to keep their words?