I appreciate you sharing your perspective on the current government. It seems like you believe that the government’s reputation is based on their alleged involvement in terror actions and their inclusion on the black list of the UN. This is an important viewpoint to consider. What are your thoughts, everyone? Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint? How do you feel about that?
Hello!!!
Your thorough investigation into this topic is respected; I’m eager to hear any endorsements or challenges you might offer.
Firstly, no one is going to rush with this recognition. Recognition or non-recognition will depend on the behavior of the Taliban they will carefully watch how responsibly they will govern the country .
Thank you for sharing your perspective. It seems like you believe that recognition of the Taliban should be contingent upon their behavior and how responsibly they govern the country. That’s an interesting point. What are your thoughts on what specific behaviors or actions should be taken into consideration when deciding whether to recognize them?
In my opinion, the functioning and change of the internal and external policies of the Taliban can be effective so that the international community and other countries think about the recognition of the Taliban.
About the matters of our country first government should take the all opinions of all people and give right to choose.
I appreciate your perspective on involving all people in decision-making processes. It’s important for governments to consider the opinions and voices of their citizens. In a democracy, giving people the right to choose can help ensure that policies and decisions are representative of the diverse needs and interests of the population. What are your thoughts on this? Do you believe that involving all people in decision-making can lead to better outcomes for the country? How do others feel about this?
In my opinion, the only possible way is to pressure on Taliban in different ways, like sanctioning their leaders, not giving them the promotion to participate in any conference in any country.
Thanks God that history exists; Don’t you know about the first time of Taliban takeover? what they did when they were recognized by many countries?!
My dear interlocutor,
I must kindly implore you to reconsider the tone and content of your message. Although discourse surrounding political matters can be weighty, it is imperative to approach such discussions with prudence and respect for all parties involved. May I propose that we continue this exchange in a more decorous manner, focusing on fostering understanding and seeking common ground? I am confident that we can engage in a more enlightening conversation.
Government obligate to find the solution of each problem in the country. All these are the responsibilities of an active government.
It is important to approach discussions with an open mind and an understanding that every situation has multiple perspectives. While it is true that the current government may face challenges regarding its reputation and actions, it is also crucial to consider other factors that may contribute to the complexities of the situation. Let’s explore this further together.
I appreciate your perspective on approaching discussions with an open mind and considering multiple perspectives. It’s essential for us to understand the complexities of the situation and explore different factors that may contribute to it. What are your thoughts on this? Do you agree or disagree with the idea that there may be other factors influencing the challenges the current government is facing? How do you feel about that?
What actions has the current government taken to address its reputation of being associated with terrorism, particularly with regards to the UN’s blacklisting?
yes i am agree with your point
The United States can completely rule out the identification issue. But considering the beginning of Biden’s talks about the terms of recognition, this situation is also unlikely. The United States can recognize some resistance movements. But considering that these movements have not been able to find a strong and serious position in this country, such an action seems unlikely.
I appreciate your insight on the identification issue and the potential recognition of resistance movements in the United States. It’s important to consider different perspectives on this matter. What are your thoughts, everyone? Do you agree or disagree with the idea that the United States can rule out the identification issue and recognize resistance movements? How do you feel about that?
now if you request to open the schools door, will they say yes ??
I appreciate your question about reopening schools. It’s a complex and important topic that affects many people. How do you feel about reopening schools? Do you believe it’s the right decision? Let’s hear from others as well. What are your thoughts, everyone?