Promote job creation in Afghanistan
is probably not correct.
The given text is a general statement about promoting job creation in Afghanistan. It does not provide any specific information or evidence to support this claim. Therefore, we cannot determine the factuality of the statement based on the given text alone.
Yes, I agree! this is good; But how and in what way can we do this?
how can we do this
is probably not correct.
The given text is a question and does not make any factual claims. Therefore, it cannot be determined whether it is factual or not.
You talk about which government?
The bolded problem is not job we have more big problem than job like lack of education until we don’t have knowledge no one give us a job.
we have more big problem than job
is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because it states that there is a bigger problem than job, without providing any evidence or context to support this claim.
we don’t have knowledge
is probably not correct.
The given text ‘we don’t have knowledge’ is a statement that implies a lack of knowledge. However, the provided evidences clearly define knowledge as awareness or familiarity with facts, practical skills, objects, or situations. Therefore, the given text is non-factual.
no one give us a job
is probably not correct.
The given text states that ‘no one gives us a job’. However, this statement is not supported by the provided evidences, which suggest various ways to find a job such as asking for referrals, contacting companies directly, using job search platforms, attending job fairs, networking, using job boards and career websites, etc.
The current government closed the schools and universities, they stopped women jobs, now they must be accountable to the international community for all this issue that they made.
The current government closed the schools and universities
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the current government closed the schools and universities. To determine the factuality of this statement, we can refer to the provided evidences. The evidences mention that some colleges have closed or announced closures since March 2020, but it does not provide information about the closure of all schools and universities. Therefore, we cannot conclude that the current government closed all schools and universities based on the provided evidences.
The current government must be accountable for all this issue
is probably not correct.
The given text is expressing an opinion about the current government being accountable for an issue. It does not provide any specific information or evidence to support this claim. Therefore, it cannot be considered factual or non-factual.
Brain drain may cause financially damage, if we try illegal ways it’s like playing with our lives in another hand we are not sure whether we pass or not. The money we spend in this way if we invest it in our region not only for ourselves but will be a job opportunity for some other youngs generation as well.
We are not sure whether we pass or not
is probably not correct.
The given text is non-factual because it states uncertainty about whether the speaker will pass or not, while the evidences clearly state that passing or failing a test depends on the cut-off score applicable to the test in question.
The first discussion is how to deal with the Taliban on this issue; Because that is the main problem
The current government closed the schools and universities
is probably not correct.
The given text states that the current government closed the schools and universities. To determine the factuality of this statement, we can refer to the provided evidences. The evidences mention that some colleges have closed or announced closures since March 2020, but it does not provide information about the closure of all schools and universities. Therefore, we cannot conclude that the current government closed all schools and universities based on the provided evidences.
Yes exactly, i agree with you, this is not a new phenomenon, there was this trend in the previous government as well.
this is not a new phenomenon
is probably not correct.
The given text does not provide any specific information or evidence to support the claim that ‘this is not a new phenomenon’. Without any evidence, it is difficult to determine the factuality of the statement.
there was this trend in the previous government
is probably not correct.
The given text does not make any specific factual claims. It is a general statement about a trend in the previous government without providing any specific details or evidence. Therefore, it is difficult to determine the factuality of the text.
You’re right but it is not a good option to limit visa or don’t give them the visa. We should somehow attract young generation when they are going abroad should come back.
it is not a good option to limit visa or don’t give them the visa
is probably not correct.
The given text is expressing an opinion rather than stating a factual claim. It does not provide any specific information or evidence to support its statement. Therefore, it cannot be evaluated for factual accuracy.
they are going abroad
is probably not correct.
The given text ‘they are going abroad’ does not provide any specific information or context. Without any additional information, it is difficult to determine the factuality of the statement.
Yes you’re absolutely right if we don’t have a government to support us and they suppress what we want that’s why we will never develop our country.
we don’t have a government to support us
is probably not correct.
The given text states that there is no government to support us. However, the provided evidences clearly indicate the existence of government programs that provide support in various areas such as food, housing, medical care, and financial assistance. Therefore, the given text is non-factual.
we will never develop our country
is probably not correct.
The given text is a subjective statement and does not provide any evidence or factual information to support its claim. It is not possible to determine the factuality of this statement based on the provided evidences.
Good
The best way to do this is to create an authoritative body from international organizations.
But this is my opinion; maybe your opinion be better than me for do it.
To enhance and make the recruiting process transparent in every sector, especially governmental authorities.