According to this definition, a newly created state can be recognized when it has the ability to comply with the norms of general international law.
In recognizing the Taliban-led government in Afghanistan, it is essential to focus on inclusive governance, human rights, and economic development. Empowering and educating the leadership can contribute to legitimacy. Challenges such as conservative resistance and cultural norms must be addressed. The closure of schools for girls hinders progress. The economic difficulties and restrictions on trade must be addressed to improve living conditions and gain recognition. Together, let’s explore innovative approaches to create a positive impact in Afghanistan.
Exactly one of the problems that exist due to the non-recognition of the Taliban is the problem of women and their lack of presence in society
I appreciate your initial thoughts on recognizing the Taliban-led government in Afghanistan. You mentioned the need to focus on inclusive governance, human rights, and economic development. These are indeed crucial aspects that require attention.
To delve deeper into the issue of inclusive governance, what specific challenges do you foresee when it comes to empowering and educating the leadership? Additionally, considering the conservative resistance and cultural norms you mentioned, what potential difficulties or roadblocks might arise in addressing these issues?
Furthermore, you highlighted the closure of schools for girls as hindering progress. Can you elaborate on the immediate and long-term consequences of this closure? And how do you think this issue could be effectively addressed within the context of recognizing the Taliban-led government?
Finally, you mentioned economic difficulties and restrictions on trade. Could you elaborate on these challenges and how they impact the overall living conditions of the people in Afghanistan? And what innovative approaches do you think could be explored to overcome these economic barriers?
Let’s unpack these issues together and strive to shed light on potential solutions and strategies for creating a positive impact in Afghanistan.
Governments that come into existence as a result of the transfer of power from one person to another do not need to be legally recognized, but they are recognized by other countries through the participation of the heads of states or governments and their representatives in the inauguration ceremony or by sending congratulatory messages.
Today in Afghanistan, there are very few explosions and suicides and the security situation is good, but security alone is not enough for the people, what if there is security and there is no bread in the hands of the people?
If there is security and people do not have the right to education, what is the use of this security? Etc …
These are all problems that people do not recognize the government.
yes i am agree with you because for the other countries is difficult to have such this risk because they are thinking about their own benefits and maybe about the people of afghanistan
I appreciate your agreement and perspective on the matter. It seems like you’re highlighting the potential issue of other countries prioritizing their own benefits over the well-being of the people in Afghanistan. Could you elaborate on this further? What are some specific concerns or challenges that could arise from this situation?
But if there is a change of government and the transfer of power from one hand to another through war, coup or revolution, other governments will recognize them based on their ideological stances, respecting the interests of the parties or respecting the universal principles of human rights, the United Nations Charter and other conditions. Or they refuse to recognize them in the short term by stating some conditions.
Hi
*** Thanks for touching on this. 
The subject’s complexities are evident, but I encourage candidness. Who’d like to discuss further? ***
Legitimacy of the government is one of the conditions from the point of view of the recognizing parties, some believe that since such governments are real, it is enough that they are recognized without considering the principle of legitimacy, which is related to their internal affairs. Compliance with international legitimacy is considered far-fetched in this opinion.
I see that you are discussing the legitimacy of governments and the differing viewpoints on this matter. Can you help me understand the different perspectives on this issue? Are there any specific concerns or challenges that arise from this debate?
but do you think that afghan people will be stressful of this kind of decisions >??
Obviously, even people were started trusting them a little bit. However after banned of education for females not only the females, but also males don’t trust this current government.
I appreciate your perspective on the government’s ban on education for females. It seems like a lack of trust has developed not only among females but also among males. Could you elaborate on the reasons behind this growing mistrust? What other factors might have contributed to this loss of trust in the current government?
America sends dollars to Afghanistan every day. It was America that handed over Afghanistan to the Taliban, so why does it not recognize this government?
This is a hidden policy of America playing against Afghanistan
If they say that the Taliban are terrorists, then why did they leave a country in the hands of the Taliban?
Afghanistan, with its territory, population and the government’s sovereignty, is recognized as permanent, and its re-recognition cannot and will not be withdrawn. However, the change that has occurred in the last two years regarding the transfer of power from the previous government to the Taliban is debatable from the point of view of general international law.
.
and also the issue of recognizing Afghanistan requires removing the strict rules of interaction with the countries of the world and finally finding an effective solution for Afghanistan, otherwise the countries will not be willing to recognize and the people of Afghanistan have not benefited from these decisions. And they face severe economic problems and we are witnessing the fact that people are not benefiting from a good economic situation and only people understand this issue.
I appreciate your input and the topic you’ve brought up about Afghanistan and the transfer of power to the Taliban. It seems like you’re suggesting that there may be some debate around this issue in terms of general international law. Could you elaborate on what specific aspects of international law are being called into question here?
You’re right but my point is the old regime was recognized but, we haven’t peace and … so why is that??